Georgia vs Rwanda: Net food imports by crop - Maize

Georgia
82,853
in 2019
Rwanda
77,051
in 2019
Georgia rank
76th
Rwanda rank
79th

Net food imports by crop - Maize over time

  • Georgia
  • Rwanda
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119902019

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 82,853 against 77,051 in Rwanda, a difference of 5,802.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Rwanda ahead.

Georgia ranks 76th and Rwanda ranks 79th of 177 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 70 1,263 1,193 Rwanda
2000s 13,104 25,988 12,884 Rwanda
2010s 50,933 98,924 47,991 Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - maize, Georgia or Rwanda?
Georgia, at 82,853 against 77,051 in Rwanda as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - maize between Georgia and Rwanda?
5,802, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Rwanda?
21 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2019.
How do Georgia and Rwanda rank globally for net food imports by crop - maize?
Georgia ranks 76th and Rwanda ranks 79th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Maize. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Maize
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
178 places, 7,874 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.