Georgia vs Namibia: Net food imports by crop - Maize

Georgia
82,853
in 2019
Namibia
95,515
in 2019
Georgia rank
76th
Namibia rank
73rd

Net food imports by crop - Maize over time

  • Georgia
  • Namibia
050.0k100.0k150.0k199720082019

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 95,515 against 82,853 in Georgia, a difference of 12,662.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Georgia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Namibia ahead.

Georgia ranks 76th and Namibia ranks 73rd of 177 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 70 135,319 135,249 Namibia
2000s 13,104 72,008 58,904 Namibia
2010s 50,933 93,152 42,218 Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - maize, Georgia or Namibia?
Namibia, at 95,515 against 82,853 in Georgia as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - maize between Georgia and Namibia?
12,662, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Namibia?
21 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2019.
How do Georgia and Namibia rank globally for net food imports by crop - maize?
Georgia ranks 76th and Namibia ranks 73rd of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Maize. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Maize
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
178 places, 7,874 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.