Georgia vs Lithuania: Net food imports by crop - Maize

Georgia
82,853
in 2019
Lithuania
83,218
in 2019
Georgia rank
76th
Lithuania rank
75th

Net food imports by crop - Maize over time

  • Georgia
  • Lithuania
-250.0k0250.0k500.0k750.0k196119902019

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 83,218 against 82,853 in Georgia, a difference of 365.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Lithuania ahead.

Georgia ranks 76th and Lithuania ranks 75th of 177 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 70 17,930 17,860 Lithuania
2000s 13,104 -108,520 121,624 Georgia
2010s 50,933 -93,154 144,087 Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - maize, Georgia or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 83,218 against 82,853 in Georgia as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - maize between Georgia and Lithuania?
365, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Lithuania?
21 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2019.
How do Georgia and Lithuania rank globally for net food imports by crop - maize?
Georgia ranks 76th and Lithuania ranks 75th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Maize. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Maize
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
178 places, 7,874 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.