Ecuador vs South Sudan: Net food imports by crop - Maize

Ecuador
42,865
in 2019
South Sudan
38,042
in 2018
Ecuador rank
88th
South Sudan rank
90th

Net food imports by crop - Maize over time

  • Ecuador
  • South Sudan
0200.0k400.0k600.0k199620072019

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 42,865 against 38,042 in South Sudan, a difference of 4,823.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 88th and South Sudan ranks 90th of 177 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador South Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 358,731 0 358,731 Ecuador
2010s 248,106 13,139 234,967 Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - maize, Ecuador or South Sudan?
Ecuador, at 42,865 against 38,042 in South Sudan as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - maize between Ecuador and South Sudan?
4,823, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Sudan?
8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2018.
How do Ecuador and South Sudan rank globally for net food imports by crop - maize?
Ecuador ranks 88th and South Sudan ranks 90th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Maize. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Maize
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
178 places, 7,874 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.