Cape Verde vs Somalia: Net food imports by crop - Maize
Cape Verde
29,644
in 2017
Somalia
24,528
in 2019
Cape Verde rank
97th
Somalia rank
100th
Net food imports by crop - Maize over time
- Cape Verde
- Somalia
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 29,644 against 24,528 in Somalia, a difference of 5,116.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.2 times Somalia's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 97th and Somalia ranks 100th of 177 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 4 and Somalia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Somalia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8,859 | 2,284 | 6,575 | Cape Verde |
| 1970s | 33,871 | 19,841 | 14,030 | Cape Verde |
| 1980s | 38,444 | 58,644 | 20,200 | Somalia |
| 1990s | 50,182 | 17,500 | 32,682 | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 26,736 | 14,919 | 11,818 | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - maize, Cape Verde or Somalia?
- Cape Verde, at 29,644 against 24,528 in Somalia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - maize between Cape Verde and Somalia?
- 5,116, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Somalia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
- How do Cape Verde and Somalia rank globally for net food imports by crop - maize?
- Cape Verde ranks 97th and Somalia ranks 100th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Maize. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.