Cape Verde vs Montenegro: Net food imports by crop - Maize

Cape Verde
29,644
in 2017
Montenegro
30,864
in 2019
Cape Verde rank
97th
Montenegro rank
96th

Net food imports by crop - Maize over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Montenegro
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119902019

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 30,864 against 29,644 in Cape Verde, a difference of 1,220.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 97th and Montenegro ranks 96th of 177 countries.

Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 19,358 14,362 4,996 Cape Verde
2010s 22,768 14,724 8,044 Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - maize, Cape Verde or Montenegro?
Montenegro, at 30,864 against 29,644 in Cape Verde as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - maize between Cape Verde and Montenegro?
1,220, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Montenegro?
9 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2017.
How do Cape Verde and Montenegro rank globally for net food imports by crop - maize?
Cape Verde ranks 97th and Montenegro ranks 96th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Maize. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Maize
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
178 places, 7,874 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.