Bolivia vs East Timor: Net food imports by crop - Maize

Bolivia
-18
in 2019
East Timor
-66
in 2018
Bolivia rank
151st
East Timor rank
153rd

Net food imports by crop - Maize over time

  • Bolivia
  • East Timor
-100.0k-50.0k050.0k100.0k196119902019

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports -18 against -66 in East Timor, a difference of 48.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1961 it was East Timor ahead.

Bolivia ranks 151st and East Timor ranks 153rd of 177 countries.

Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia East Timor Difference Ahead
1960s 11.56 -95 106.56 Bolivia
1970s 1,537 -149.67 1,687 Bolivia
2010s 48,191 -32 48,223 Bolivia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - maize, Bolivia or East Timor?
Bolivia, at -18 against -66 in East Timor as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - maize between Bolivia and East Timor?
48, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and East Timor?
14 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2018.
How do Bolivia and East Timor rank globally for net food imports by crop - maize?
Bolivia ranks 151st and East Timor ranks 153rd of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Maize. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Maize
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
178 places, 7,874 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.