Bhutan vs Myanmar: Net food imports by crop - Maize

Bhutan
10,137
in 2019
Myanmar
11,646
in 2019
Bhutan rank
112th
Myanmar rank
109th

Net food imports by crop - Maize over time

  • Bhutan
  • Myanmar
-600.0k-400.0k-200.0k0199120052019

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 11,646 against 10,137 in Bhutan, a difference of 1,509.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 112th and Myanmar ranks 109th of 177 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Myanmar Difference Ahead
1990s 3,810 2,125 1,686 Bhutan
2000s 4,494 868.9 3,625 Bhutan
2010s 12,356 -90,635 102,992 Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - maize, Bhutan or Myanmar?
Myanmar, at 11,646 against 10,137 in Bhutan as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - maize between Bhutan and Myanmar?
1,509, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Myanmar?
24 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2019.
How do Bhutan and Myanmar rank globally for net food imports by crop - maize?
Bhutan ranks 112th and Myanmar ranks 109th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Maize. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Maize
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
178 places, 7,874 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.