Belarus vs Nepal: Net food imports by crop - Maize

Belarus
310,718
in 2019
Nepal
334,392
in 2019
Belarus rank
52nd
Nepal rank
49th

Net food imports by crop - Maize over time

  • Belarus
  • Nepal
0200.0k400.0k196119902019

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 334,392 against 310,718 in Belarus, a difference of 23,674.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Nepal ahead.

Belarus ranks 52nd and Nepal ranks 49th of 177 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Nepal Difference Ahead
1990s 86,018 2,851 83,167 Belarus
2000s 177,058 18,869 158,189 Belarus
2010s 104,324 298,745 194,421 Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - maize, Belarus or Nepal?
Nepal, at 334,392 against 310,718 in Belarus as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - maize between Belarus and Nepal?
23,674, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Nepal?
25 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2019.
How do Belarus and Nepal rank globally for net food imports by crop - maize?
Belarus ranks 52nd and Nepal ranks 49th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Maize. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Maize
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
178 places, 7,874 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.