Afghanistan vs Bhutan: Net food imports by crop - Maize

Afghanistan
10,437
in 2019
Bhutan
10,137
in 2019
Afghanistan rank
110th
Bhutan rank
112th

Net food imports by crop - Maize over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Bhutan
010.0k20.0k30.0k199120052019

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 10,437 against 10,137 in Bhutan, a difference of 300.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Afghanistan ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 110th and Bhutan ranks 112th of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Bhutan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Bhutan Difference Ahead
2000s 7,516 4,432 3,084 Afghanistan
2010s 7,527 12,356 4,829 Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - maize, Afghanistan or Bhutan?
Afghanistan, at 10,437 against 10,137 in Bhutan as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - maize between Afghanistan and Bhutan?
300, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Bhutan?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Afghanistan and Bhutan rank globally for net food imports by crop - maize?
Afghanistan ranks 110th and Bhutan ranks 112th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Maize. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Maize
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
178 places, 7,874 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.