New Caledonia vs Papua New Guinea: Net food imports by crop - Barley
New Caledonia
1,404
in 2018
Papua New Guinea
499
in 2019
New Caledonia rank
66th
Papua New Guinea rank
69th
Net food imports by crop - Barley over time
- New Caledonia
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 1,404 against 499 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 905.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 2.8 times Papua New Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2001 it was New Caledonia ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 66th and Papua New Guinea ranks 69th of 158 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 107.78 | -13.33 | 121.11 | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 342.22 | 49 | 293.22 | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - barley, New Caledonia or Papua New Guinea?
- New Caledonia, at 1,404 against 499 in Papua New Guinea as of 2018.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - barley between New Caledonia and Papua New Guinea?
- 905, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Papua New Guinea?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2018.
- How do New Caledonia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for net food imports by crop - barley?
- New Caledonia ranks 66th and Papua New Guinea ranks 69th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Barley. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.