Namibia vs Rwanda: Net food imports by crop - Barley

Namibia
148
in 2019
Rwanda
189
in 2019
Namibia rank
76th
Rwanda rank
74th

Net food imports by crop - Barley over time

  • Namibia
  • Rwanda
-4.0k-3.0k-2.0k-1.0k01.0k196119902019

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 189 against 148 in Namibia, a difference of 41.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 76th and Rwanda ranks 74th of 157 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 381.33 0 381.33 Namibia
2000s -2.44 -1.89 0.5556 Rwanda
2010s 95.12 -968.62 1,064 Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - barley, Namibia or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 189 against 148 in Namibia as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - barley between Namibia and Rwanda?
41, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Rwanda?
20 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2019.
How do Namibia and Rwanda rank globally for net food imports by crop - barley?
Namibia ranks 76th and Rwanda ranks 74th of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Barley. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Barley
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
158 places, 6,776 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.