Myanmar vs Namibia: Net food imports by crop - Barley

Myanmar
183
in 2019
Namibia
148
in 2019
Myanmar rank
75th
Namibia rank
76th

Net food imports by crop - Barley over time

  • Myanmar
  • Namibia
-300.0k-200.0k-100.0k0196119902019

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 183 against 148 in Namibia, a difference of 35.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Namibia ahead.

Myanmar ranks 75th and Namibia ranks 76th of 157 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 20 381.33 361.33 Namibia
2000s 281.22 -2.44 283.67 Myanmar
2010s -51,166 95.12 51,261 Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - barley, Myanmar or Namibia?
Myanmar, at 183 against 148 in Namibia as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - barley between Myanmar and Namibia?
35, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Namibia?
20 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2019.
How do Myanmar and Namibia rank globally for net food imports by crop - barley?
Myanmar ranks 75th and Namibia ranks 76th of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Barley. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Barley
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
158 places, 6,776 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.