Mozambique vs Myanmar: Net food imports by crop - Barley
Mozambique
96
in 2019
Myanmar
183
in 2019
Mozambique rank
77th
Myanmar rank
75th
Net food imports by crop - Barley over time
- Mozambique
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 183 against 96 in Mozambique, a difference of 87.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.9 times Mozambique's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mozambique ahead.
Mozambique ranks 77th and Myanmar ranks 75th of 157 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Myanmar in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -19,029 | 15.33 | 19,045 | Myanmar |
| 1970s | -18,330 | 1.4 | 18,331 | Myanmar |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0 | 6.4 | 6.4 | Myanmar |
| 2000s | -18,836 | 253.1 | 19,090 | Myanmar |
| 2010s | -8,470 | -51,166 | 42,696 | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - barley, Mozambique or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 183 against 96 in Mozambique as of 2019.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - barley between Mozambique and Myanmar?
- 87, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Myanmar?
- 57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
- How do Mozambique and Myanmar rank globally for net food imports by crop - barley?
- Mozambique ranks 77th and Myanmar ranks 75th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Barley. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.