Brazil vs Japan: Net food imports by crop - Barley
Brazil
671,336
in 2019
Japan
1.15 million
in 2019
Brazil rank
9th
Japan rank
6th
Net food imports by crop - Barley over time
- Brazil
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 1.15 million against 671,336 in Brazil, a difference of 476,394.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.7 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 9th and Japan ranks 6th of 158 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 32,717 | 404,384 | 371,667 | Japan |
| 1970s | 27,842 | 1.35 million | 1.32 million | Japan |
| 1980s | 142,402 | 1.43 million | 1.29 million | Japan |
| 1990s | 149,403 | 1.57 million | 1.42 million | Japan |
| 2000s | 212,032 | 1.42 million | 1.21 million | Japan |
| 2010s | -4.66 million | 1.25 million | 5.91 million | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - barley, Brazil or Japan?
- Japan, at 1.15 million against 671,336 in Brazil as of 2019.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - barley between Brazil and Japan?
- 476,394, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Japan?
- 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Japan rank globally for net food imports by crop - barley?
- Brazil ranks 9th and Japan ranks 6th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Barley. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.