Belarus vs Israel: Net food imports by crop - Barley

Belarus
224,763
in 2019
Israel
260,755
in 2019
Belarus rank
21st
Israel rank
19th

Net food imports by crop - Barley over time

  • Belarus
  • Israel
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119902019

How they compare

Israel currently reports 260,755 against 224,763 in Belarus, a difference of 35,992.

That makes Israel's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 21st and Israel ranks 19th of 157 countries.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Israel Difference Ahead
1990s 165,945 526,293 360,348 Israel
2000s 121,844 349,642 227,799 Israel
2010s 56,138 307,016 250,878 Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - barley, Belarus or Israel?
Israel, at 260,755 against 224,763 in Belarus as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - barley between Belarus and Israel?
35,992, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Israel?
25 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2019.
How do Belarus and Israel rank globally for net food imports by crop - barley?
Belarus ranks 21st and Israel ranks 19th of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Barley. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Barley
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
158 places, 6,776 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.