China (People’s Republic of) vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Lithuania

China (People’s Republic of)
33,114 current US$
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
1.84 million current US$
in 2022
China (People’s Republic of) rank
19th
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
20th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Lithuania over time

  • China (People’s Republic of)
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M200520142023

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) currently reports 1.84 million current US$ against 33,114 current US$ in China (People’s Republic of), a difference of 1.81 million current US$.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)'s figure about 55.6 times China (People’s Republic of)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.

China (People’s Republic of) ranks 19th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 20th of 59 countries.

Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China (People’s Republic of) Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
2000s 50,000 current US$ 60,000 current US$ 10,000 current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
2010s 40,729 current US$ 71,429 current US$ 30,700 current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
2020s 43,456 current US$ 950,000 current US$ 906,544 current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, lithuania, China (People’s Republic of) or Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), at 1.84 million current US$ against 33,114 current US$ in China (People’s Republic of) as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, lithuania between China (People’s Republic of) and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
1.81 million current US$, with Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2022.
How do China (People’s Republic of) and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, lithuania?
China (People’s Republic of) ranks 19th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 20th of 59 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Lithuania (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China (People’s Republic of) vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Lithuania. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-lithuania-current-us/china/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-lithuania-current-us/china/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">China (People’s Republic of) vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Lithuania</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Lithuania (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
98 places, 1,272 data points, 2005–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Lithuania, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.