China vs Least developed countries: UN classification: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Lithuania

China
33,114 current US$
in 2023
Least developed countries: UN classification
1.82 million current US$
in 2022
China rank
19th
Least developed countries: UN classification rank
21st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Lithuania over time

  • China
  • Least developed countries: UN classification
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M200520142023

How they compare

Least developed countries: UN classification currently reports 1.82 million current US$ against 33,114 current US$ in China, a difference of 1.79 million current US$.

That makes Least developed countries: UN classification's figure about 55.0 times China's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Least developed countries: UN classification has been ahead every year.

China ranks 19th and Least developed countries: UN classification ranks 21st of 58 countries.

Least developed countries: UN classification has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Least developed countries: UN classification Difference Ahead
2000s 50,000 current US$ 14.29 million current US$ 14.24 million current US$ Least developed countries: UN classification
2010s 38,138 current US$ 3.01 million current US$ 2.97 million current US$ Least developed countries: UN classification
2020s 43,456 current US$ 1.02 million current US$ 979,878 current US$ Least developed countries: UN classification

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, lithuania, China or Least developed countries: UN classification?
Least developed countries: UN classification, at 1.82 million current US$ against 33,114 current US$ in China as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, lithuania between China and Least developed countries: UN classification?
1.79 million current US$, with Least developed countries: UN classification ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Least developed countries: UN classification?
13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2022.
How do China and Least developed countries: UN classification rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, lithuania?
China ranks 19th and Least developed countries: UN classification ranks 21st of 58 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Lithuania (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Lithuania (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
98 places, 1,272 data points, 2005–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Lithuania, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.