Late-demographic dividend vs Libya: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Estonia
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Estonia over time
- Late-demographic dividend
- Libya
How they compare
Late-demographic dividend currently reports 1.32 million current US$ against 64,879 current US$ in Libya, a difference of 1.26 million current US$.
That makes Late-demographic dividend's figure about 20.3 times Libya's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Late-demographic dividend has been ahead every year.
Late-demographic dividend ranks 17th and Libya ranks 15th of 40 groups.
Late-demographic dividend has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Late-demographic dividend | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.29 million current US$ | 77,655 current US$ | 2.21 million current US$ | Late-demographic dividend |
| 2020s | 1.61 million current US$ | 56,980 current US$ | 1.55 million current US$ | Late-demographic dividend |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, estonia, Late-demographic dividend or Libya?
- Late-demographic dividend, at 1.32 million current US$ against 64,879 current US$ in Libya as of 2022.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, estonia between Late-demographic dividend and Libya?
- 1.26 million current US$, with Late-demographic dividend ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Late-demographic dividend and Libya?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Late-demographic dividend and Libya rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, estonia?
- Late-demographic dividend ranks 17th and Libya ranks 15th of 40 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Estonia (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Lithuania, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.