Lithuania vs Samoa: Total natural resource rents
Lithuania
0.3%
in 2021
Samoa
0.3%
in 2021
Lithuania rank
147th
Samoa rank
148th
Total natural resource rents over time
- Lithuania
- Samoa
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.3% against 0.3% in Samoa, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Samoa ahead.
Lithuania ranks 147th and Samoa ranks 148th of 211 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 3 and Samoa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.1% | 1.5% | 0.4% | Samoa |
| 2000s | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.2% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.0% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total natural resource rents, Lithuania or Samoa?
- Lithuania, at 0.3% against 0.3% in Samoa as of 2021.
- What is the difference in total natural resource rents between Lithuania and Samoa?
- 0.0%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Samoa?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
- How do Lithuania and Samoa rank globally for total natural resource rents?
- Lithuania ranks 147th and Samoa ranks 148th of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank staff estimates, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Total natural resource rents. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Natural resources rents are estimated as the difference between the price of a commodity and the average cost of producing it. Total natural resources rents are the sum of oil rents, natural gas rents, coal rents, mineral rents, and forest rents.