Georgia vs Pakistan: Total natural resource rents
Georgia
1.4%
in 2021
Pakistan
1.4%
in 2021
Georgia rank
111th
Pakistan rank
110th
Total natural resource rents over time
- Georgia
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 1.4% against 1.4% in Georgia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 111th and Pakistan ranks 110th of 211 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4% | 1.3% | 0.9% | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 0.8% | 2.3% | 1.5% | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 0.8% | 1.7% | 0.9% | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 1.2% | 1.3% | 0.1% | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total natural resource rents, Georgia or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 1.4% against 1.4% in Georgia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in total natural resource rents between Georgia and Pakistan?
- 0.0%, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Pakistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and Pakistan rank globally for total natural resource rents?
- Georgia ranks 111th and Pakistan ranks 110th of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank staff estimates, via World Bank (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Total natural resource rents. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Natural resources rents are estimated as the difference between the price of a commodity and the average cost of producing it. Total natural resources rents are the sum of oil rents, natural gas rents, coal rents, mineral rents, and forest rents.