China vs Serbia: Natural resource rents
China
1.71
in 2021
Serbia
1.75
in 2021
China rank
106th
Serbia rank
104th
Natural resource rents over time
- China
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 1.75 against 1.71 in China, a difference of 0.04.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was China ahead.
China ranks 106th and Serbia ranks 104th of 211 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.44 | 0.4074 | 2.04 | China |
| 2000s | 4.45 | 1.52 | 2.93 | China |
| 2010s | 2.96 | 1.93 | 1.03 | China |
| 2020s | 1.29 | 1.35 | 0.0613 | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural resource rents, China or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 1.75 against 1.71 in China as of 2021.
- What is the difference in natural resource rents between China and Serbia?
- 0.04, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Serbia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
- How do China and Serbia rank globally for natural resource rents?
- China ranks 106th and Serbia ranks 104th of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Natural resource rents. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.