Australia vs South Sudan: Natural resource rents
Australia
13.36
in 2021
South Sudan
13.05
in 2015
Australia rank
38th
South Sudan rank
40th
Natural resource rents over time
- Australia
- South Sudan
How they compare
Australia currently reports 13.36 against 13.05 in South Sudan, a difference of 0.31.
Across all 8 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 38th and South Sudan ranks 40th of 211 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.75 | 46.73 | 39.99 | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 5.9 | 26.22 | 20.32 | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural resource rents, Australia or South Sudan?
- Australia, at 13.36 against 13.05 in South Sudan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in natural resource rents between Australia and South Sudan?
- 0.31, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do Australia and South Sudan rank globally for natural resource rents?
- Australia ranks 38th and South Sudan ranks 40th of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Natural resource rents. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.