Aruba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Natural resource rents
Aruba
0.0021
in 2021
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0033
in 2021
Aruba rank
183rd
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
180th
Natural resource rents over time
- Aruba
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.0033 against 0.0021 in Aruba, a difference of 0.0012.
That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.6 times Aruba's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
Aruba ranks 183rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 180th of 211 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.002 | 0.0017 | 0.0002 | Aruba |
| 2010s | 0.0029 | 0.0043 | 0.0014 | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 2020s | 0.0026 | 0.0037 | 0.0012 | Turks and Caicos Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural resource rents, Aruba or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.0033 against 0.0021 in Aruba as of 2021.
- What is the difference in natural resource rents between Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 0.0012, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for natural resource rents?
- Aruba ranks 183rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 180th of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Natural resource rents. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.