Aruba vs Hong Kong: Natural resource rents

Aruba
0.0021
in 2021
Hong Kong
0.001
in 2021
Aruba rank
183rd
Hong Kong rank
185th

Natural resource rents over time

  • Aruba
  • Hong Kong
00.0050.010.015197019952021

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 0.0021 against 0.001 in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.0011.

That makes Aruba's figure about 2.1 times Hong Kong's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Aruba ranks 183rd and Hong Kong ranks 185th of 211 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 3 and Hong Kong in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0007 0.0016 0.0009 Hong Kong
1990s 0.0011 0.0011 0 Aruba
2000s 0.0019 0.0009 0.001 Aruba
2010s 0.0029 0.004 0.0011 Hong Kong
2020s 0.0026 0.0009 0.0016 Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural resource rents, Aruba or Hong Kong?
Aruba, at 0.0021 against 0.001 in Hong Kong as of 2021.
What is the difference in natural resource rents between Aruba and Hong Kong?
0.0011, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Hong Kong?
36 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2021.
How do Aruba and Hong Kong rank globally for natural resource rents?
Aruba ranks 183rd and Hong Kong ranks 185th of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Natural resource rents. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Natural resource rents
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
211 places, 9,209 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed