Iceland vs United States: Natural resource rents, per square kilometre

Iceland
0 units per square kilometre
in 2021
United States
0 units per square kilometre
in 2021
Iceland rank
187th
United States rank
184th

Natural resource rents, per square kilometre over time

  • Iceland
  • United States
0000197019952021

How they compare

United States currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes United States's figure about 131.9 times Iceland's.

Across all 52 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 187th and United States ranks 184th of 210 countries.

United States has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland United States Difference Ahead
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre United States
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre United States
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre United States
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre United States
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre United States
2020s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural resource rents, per square kilometre, Iceland or United States?
United States, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2021.
What is the difference in natural resource rents, per square kilometre between Iceland and United States?
0 units per square kilometre, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and United States?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Iceland and United States rank globally for natural resource rents, per square kilometre?
Iceland ranks 187th and United States ranks 184th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Natural resource rents, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs United States: Natural resource rents, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/natural-resource-rents-per-square-kilometre/iceland/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/natural-resource-rents-per-square-kilometre/iceland/united-states/">Iceland vs United States: Natural resource rents, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural resource rents, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 9,015 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Natural resource rents divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.