Cuba vs South Africa: Natural resource rents, per square kilometre

Cuba
0 units per square kilometre
in 2020
South Africa
0 units per square kilometre
in 2021
Cuba rank
127th
South Africa rank
125th

Natural resource rents, per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • South Africa
0000197019952021

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 127th and South Africa ranks 125th of 210 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 5 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba South Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural resource rents, per square kilometre, Cuba or South Africa?
South Africa, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2021.
What is the difference in natural resource rents, per square kilometre between Cuba and South Africa?
0 units per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and South Africa?
51 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2020.
How do Cuba and South Africa rank globally for natural resource rents, per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 127th and South Africa ranks 125th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Natural resource rents, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs South Africa: Natural resource rents, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/natural-resource-rents-per-square-kilometre/cuba/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/natural-resource-rents-per-square-kilometre/cuba/south-africa/">Cuba vs South Africa: Natural resource rents, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural resource rents, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 9,015 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Natural resource rents divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.