Australia vs Finland: Natural resource rents, per square kilometre

Australia
0 units per square kilometre
in 2021
Finland
0 units per square kilometre
in 2021
Australia rank
155th
Finland rank
156th

Natural resource rents, per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Finland
0000197019952021

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times Finland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Finland ahead.

Australia ranks 155th and Finland ranks 156th of 210 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Finland Difference Ahead
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Finland
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Finland
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Finland
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Finland
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Finland
2020s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural resource rents, per square kilometre, Australia or Finland?
Australia, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Finland as of 2021.
What is the difference in natural resource rents, per square kilometre between Australia and Finland?
0 units per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Finland?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Australia and Finland rank globally for natural resource rents, per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 155th and Finland ranks 156th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Natural resource rents, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Finland: Natural resource rents, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/natural-resource-rents-per-square-kilometre/australia/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/natural-resource-rents-per-square-kilometre/australia/finland/">Australia vs Finland: Natural resource rents, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural resource rents, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 9,015 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Natural resource rents divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.