Poland vs Portugal: Natural resource rents, per capita
Poland
0 units per person
in 2021
Portugal
0 units per person
in 2021
Poland rank
148th
Portugal rank
147th
Natural resource rents, per capita over time
- Poland
- Portugal
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Poland, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 148th and Portugal ranks 147th of 211 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 3 and Portugal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Poland |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Poland |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Poland |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural resource rents, per capita, Poland or Portugal?
- Portugal, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Poland as of 2021.
- What is the difference in natural resource rents, per capita between Poland and Portugal?
- 0 units per person, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Portugal?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
- How do Poland and Portugal rank globally for natural resource rents, per capita?
- Poland ranks 148th and Portugal ranks 147th of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Natural resource rents, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Natural resource rents divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.