Nicaragua vs Uzbekistan: Natural resource rents, per capita
Nicaragua
0 units per person
in 2021
Uzbekistan
0 units per person
in 2021
Nicaragua rank
67th
Uzbekistan rank
65th
Natural resource rents, per capita over time
- Nicaragua
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Nicaragua, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 67th and Uzbekistan ranks 65th of 211 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural resource rents, per capita, Nicaragua or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Nicaragua as of 2021.
- What is the difference in natural resource rents, per capita between Nicaragua and Uzbekistan?
- 0 units per person, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
- How do Nicaragua and Uzbekistan rank globally for natural resource rents, per capita?
- Nicaragua ranks 67th and Uzbekistan ranks 65th of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Natural resource rents, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Natural resource rents divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.