Moldova vs Tanzania: Natural resource rents, per capita
Moldova
0 units per person
in 2021
Tanzania
0 units per person
in 2021
Moldova rank
123rd
Tanzania rank
120th
Natural resource rents, per capita over time
- Moldova
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Moldova, a difference of 0 units per person.
That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.2 times Moldova's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Tanzania ahead.
Moldova ranks 123rd and Tanzania ranks 120th of 211 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Moldova averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Tanzania |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural resource rents, per capita, Moldova or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Moldova as of 2021.
- What is the difference in natural resource rents, per capita between Moldova and Tanzania?
- 0 units per person, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Tanzania?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
- How do Moldova and Tanzania rank globally for natural resource rents, per capita?
- Moldova ranks 123rd and Tanzania ranks 120th of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Natural resource rents, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Natural resource rents divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.