Laos vs Latvia: Natural resource rents, per capita
Laos
0 units per person
in 2021
Latvia
0 units per person
in 2021
Laos rank
62nd
Latvia rank
64th
Natural resource rents, per capita over time
- Laos
- Latvia
How they compare
Laos currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Latvia, a difference of 0 units per person.
That makes Laos's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Laos ahead.
Laos ranks 62nd and Latvia ranks 64th of 211 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Laos averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Laos |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Laos |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Laos |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural resource rents, per capita, Laos or Latvia?
- Laos, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Latvia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in natural resource rents, per capita between Laos and Latvia?
- 0 units per person, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Latvia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
- How do Laos and Latvia rank globally for natural resource rents, per capita?
- Laos ranks 62nd and Latvia ranks 64th of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Natural resource rents, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Natural resource rents divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.