Kazakhstan vs Namibia: Natural resource rents, per capita
Kazakhstan
0 units per person
in 2021
Namibia
0 units per person
in 2021
Kazakhstan rank
40th
Namibia rank
39th
Natural resource rents, per capita over time
- Kazakhstan
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 units per person.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 40th and Namibia ranks 39th of 211 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural resource rents, per capita, Kazakhstan or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Kazakhstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in natural resource rents, per capita between Kazakhstan and Namibia?
- 0 units per person, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Namibia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and Namibia rank globally for natural resource rents, per capita?
- Kazakhstan ranks 40th and Namibia ranks 39th of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Natural resource rents, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Natural resource rents divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.