Eritrea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Natural resource rents, per capita
Eritrea
0 units per person
in 2011
Sao Tome and Principe
0 units per person
in 2021
Eritrea rank
12th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
14th
Natural resource rents, per capita over time
- Eritrea
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 units per person.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 12th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 14th of 211 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural resource rents, per capita, Eritrea or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Eritrea, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2011.
- What is the difference in natural resource rents, per capita between Eritrea and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0 units per person, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for natural resource rents, per capita?
- Eritrea ranks 12th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 14th of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Natural resource rents, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Natural resource rents divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.