Croatia vs Uganda: Natural resource rents, per capita
Croatia
0 units per person
in 2021
Uganda
0 units per person
in 2021
Croatia rank
103rd
Uganda rank
106th
Natural resource rents, per capita over time
- Croatia
- Uganda
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Uganda, a difference of 0 units per person.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Uganda ahead.
Croatia ranks 103rd and Uganda ranks 106th of 211 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Uganda |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Uganda |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Uganda |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural resource rents, per capita, Croatia or Uganda?
- Croatia, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Uganda as of 2021.
- What is the difference in natural resource rents, per capita between Croatia and Uganda?
- 0 units per person, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Uganda?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
- How do Croatia and Uganda rank globally for natural resource rents, per capita?
- Croatia ranks 103rd and Uganda ranks 106th of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Natural resource rents, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Natural resource rents divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.