Brazil vs Czechia: Natural resource rents, per capita
Brazil
0 units per person
in 2021
Czechia
0 units per person
in 2021
Brazil rank
141st
Czechia rank
143rd
Natural resource rents, per capita over time
- Brazil
- Czechia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Czechia, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Czechia ahead.
Brazil ranks 141st and Czechia ranks 143rd of 211 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural resource rents, per capita, Brazil or Czechia?
- Brazil, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Czechia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in natural resource rents, per capita between Brazil and Czechia?
- 0 units per person, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Czechia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
- How do Brazil and Czechia rank globally for natural resource rents, per capita?
- Brazil ranks 141st and Czechia ranks 143rd of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Natural resource rents, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Natural resource rents divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.