Barbados vs South Sudan: Natural resource rents, per capita
Barbados
0 units per person
in 2021
South Sudan
0 units per person
in 2015
Barbados rank
47th
South Sudan rank
46th
Natural resource rents, per capita over time
- Barbados
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Barbados, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was South Sudan ahead.
Barbados ranks 47th and South Sudan ranks 46th of 211 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural resource rents, per capita, Barbados or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Barbados as of 2015.
- What is the difference in natural resource rents, per capita between Barbados and South Sudan?
- 0 units per person, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do Barbados and South Sudan rank globally for natural resource rents, per capita?
- Barbados ranks 47th and South Sudan ranks 46th of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Natural resource rents, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Natural resource rents divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.