South Korea vs Malta: Natural resource rents, annual growth rate
South Korea
-56.02 % change on previous year
in 2021
Malta
-100 % change on previous year
in 2010
South Korea rank
188th
Malta rank
189th
Natural resource rents, annual growth rate over time
- South Korea
- Malta
How they compare
South Korea currently reports -56.02 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Malta, a difference of 43.98 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Malta ahead.
South Korea ranks 188th and Malta ranks 189th of 190 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.14 % change on previous year | -14.84 % change on previous year | 32.99 % change on previous year | South Korea |
| 2010s | 28.84 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | 128.84 % change on previous year | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural resource rents, annual growth rate, South Korea or Malta?
- South Korea, at -56.02 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Malta as of 2021.
- What is the difference in natural resource rents, annual growth rate between South Korea and Malta?
- 43.98 % change on previous year, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Malta?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2010.
- How do South Korea and Malta rank globally for natural resource rents, annual growth rate?
- South Korea ranks 188th and Malta ranks 189th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Natural resource rents, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Natural resource rents. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.