Japan vs South Sudan: Natural resource rents, annual growth rate
Japan
-51.23 % change on previous year
in 2021
South Sudan
-54.13 % change on previous year
in 2015
Japan rank
186th
South Sudan rank
187th
Natural resource rents, annual growth rate over time
- Japan
- South Sudan
How they compare
Japan currently reports -51.23 % change on previous year against -54.13 % change on previous year in South Sudan, a difference of 2.9 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 186th and South Sudan ranks 187th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -18.87 % change on previous year | -39.62 % change on previous year | 20.75 % change on previous year | Japan |
| 2010s | 7.26 % change on previous year | 25.88 % change on previous year | 18.63 % change on previous year | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural resource rents, annual growth rate, Japan or South Sudan?
- Japan, at -51.23 % change on previous year against -54.13 % change on previous year in South Sudan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in natural resource rents, annual growth rate between Japan and South Sudan?
- 2.9 % change on previous year, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and South Sudan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2015.
- How do Japan and South Sudan rank globally for natural resource rents, annual growth rate?
- Japan ranks 186th and South Sudan ranks 187th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Natural resource rents, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Natural resource rents. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.