Japan vs Malta: Natural resource rents, annual growth rate
Japan
-51.23 % change on previous year
in 2021
Malta
-100 % change on previous year
in 2010
Japan rank
186th
Malta rank
189th
Natural resource rents, annual growth rate over time
- Japan
- Malta
How they compare
Japan currently reports -51.23 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Malta, a difference of 48.77 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 186th and Malta ranks 189th of 190 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.56 % change on previous year | -14.84 % change on previous year | 19.4 % change on previous year | Japan |
| 2010s | 3.33 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | 103.33 % change on previous year | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural resource rents, annual growth rate, Japan or Malta?
- Japan, at -51.23 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Malta as of 2021.
- What is the difference in natural resource rents, annual growth rate between Japan and Malta?
- 48.77 % change on previous year, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Malta?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2010.
- How do Japan and Malta rank globally for natural resource rents, annual growth rate?
- Japan ranks 186th and Malta ranks 189th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Natural resource rents, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Natural resource rents. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.