Djibouti vs Eswatini: Global number of reported disasters by size
Djibouti
0 events
in 2022
Eswatini
0 events
in 2023
Djibouti rank
71st
Eswatini rank
71st
Global number of reported disasters by size over time
- Djibouti
- Eswatini
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 0 events against 0 events in Eswatini, a difference of 0 events.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Djibouti ranks 71st and Eswatini ranks 71st of 202 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 events | 0 events | 0 events | — |
| 2000s | 0 events | 0.5 events | 0.5 events | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0 events | 0 events | 0 events | — |
| 2020s | 0 events | 1 events | 1 events | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global number of reported disasters by size, Djibouti or Eswatini?
- Djibouti, at 0 events against 0 events in Eswatini as of 2022.
- What is the difference in global number of reported disasters by size between Djibouti and Eswatini?
- 0 events, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Eswatini?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2022.
- How do Djibouti and Eswatini rank globally for global number of reported disasters by size?
- Djibouti ranks 71st and Eswatini ranks 71st of 202 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EM-DAT, CRED / UCLouvain (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Global number of reported disasters by size. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported disasters that result in no more than 5 deaths, affect no more than 1,500 people, and cause economic damages not exceeding 13 million current US dollars. The economic threshold for previous years is adjusted for inflation accordingly.