Cook Islands vs Zimbabwe: Global number of reported disasters by size

Cook Islands
0 events
in 2010
Zimbabwe
0 events
in 2024
Cook Islands rank
66th
Zimbabwe rank
66th

Global number of reported disasters by size over time

  • Cook Islands
  • Zimbabwe
00.20.40.60.81194219832024

How they compare

Cook Islands currently reports 0 events against 0 events in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 events.

Cook Islands ranks 66th and Zimbabwe ranks 66th of 199 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Cook Islands averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cook Islands Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 1 events 0 events 1 events Cook Islands
2010s 0 events 1 events 1 events Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher global number of reported disasters by size, Cook Islands or Zimbabwe?
Cook Islands, at 0 events against 0 events in Zimbabwe as of 2010.
What is the difference in global number of reported disasters by size between Cook Islands and Zimbabwe?
0 events, with Cook Islands ahead.
How do Cook Islands and Zimbabwe rank globally for global number of reported disasters by size?
Cook Islands ranks 66th and Zimbabwe ranks 66th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EM-DAT, CRED / UCLouvain (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Global number of reported disasters by size. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Global number of reported disasters by size
Unit
events
Source
EM-DAT, CRED / UCLouvain (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
200 places, 6,037 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Reported disasters that result in no more than 5 deaths, affect no more than 1,500 people, and cause economic damages not exceeding 13 million current US dollars. The economic threshold for previous years is adjusted for inflation accordingly.