Antigua and Barbuda vs New Caledonia: Natural disasters by decadal size

Antigua and Barbuda
0
in 2010
New Caledonia
0
in 2020
Antigua and Barbuda rank
104th
New Caledonia rank
104th

Natural disasters by decadal size over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • New Caledonia
0123193019752020

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0 against 0 in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 1950 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 104th and New Caledonia ranks 104th of 156 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1950s 1 3 2 New Caledonia
1960s 1 0 1 Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 0 1 1 New Caledonia
1990s 0 0 0
2000s 0 0 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural disasters by decadal size, Antigua and Barbuda or New Caledonia?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 0 against 0 in New Caledonia as of 2010.
What is the difference in natural disasters by decadal size between Antigua and Barbuda and New Caledonia?
0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and New Caledonia?
5 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2000.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and New Caledonia rank globally for natural disasters by decadal size?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 104th and New Caledonia ranks 104th of 156 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Natural disasters by decadal size. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Natural disasters by decadal size
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
157 places, 1,277 data points, 1900–2020
Last refreshed