Antigua and Barbuda vs Cook Islands: Natural disasters by decadal size
Antigua and Barbuda
0
in 2010
Cook Islands
0
in 2010
Antigua and Barbuda rank
104th
Cook Islands rank
104th
Natural disasters by decadal size over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Cook Islands
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0 against 0 in Cook Islands, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 104th and Cook Islands ranks 104th of 156 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 1 and Cook Islands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Cook Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Cook Islands |
| 2000s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Cook Islands |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural disasters by decadal size, Antigua and Barbuda or Cook Islands?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 0 against 0 in Cook Islands as of 2010.
- What is the difference in natural disasters by decadal size between Antigua and Barbuda and Cook Islands?
- 0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Cook Islands?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Cook Islands rank globally for natural disasters by decadal size?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 104th and Cook Islands ranks 104th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Natural disasters by decadal size. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.