Canada vs Hungary: NAAG Chapter 3B: Gross fixed capital formation by asset type

Canada
22.9 Percentage of GDP
in 2025
Hungary
21.94 Percentage of GDP
in 2025
Canada rank
19th
Hungary rank
22nd

NAAG Chapter 3B: Gross fixed capital formation by asset type over time

  • Canada
  • Hungary
0102030197019972025

How they compare

Canada currently reports 22.9 Percentage of GDP against 21.94 Percentage of GDP in Hungary, a difference of 0.96 Percentage of GDP.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Hungary ahead.

Canada ranks 19th and Hungary ranks 22nd of 36 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 1 and Hungary in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Hungary Difference Ahead
1990s 19.54 Percentage of GDP 22.58 Percentage of GDP 3.04 Percentage of GDP Hungary
2000s 21.44 Percentage of GDP 23.98 Percentage of GDP 2.54 Percentage of GDP Hungary
2010s 23.46 Percentage of GDP 21.81 Percentage of GDP 1.66 Percentage of GDP Canada
2020s 23.15 Percentage of GDP 25.33 Percentage of GDP 2.18 Percentage of GDP Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher naag chapter 3b: gross fixed capital formation by asset type, Canada or Hungary?
Canada, at 22.9 Percentage of GDP against 21.94 Percentage of GDP in Hungary as of 2025.
What is the difference in naag chapter 3b: gross fixed capital formation by asset type between Canada and Hungary?
0.96 Percentage of GDP, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Hungary?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Canada and Hungary rank globally for naag chapter 3b: gross fixed capital formation by asset type?
Canada ranks 19th and Hungary ranks 22nd of 36 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as NAAG Chapter 3B: Gross fixed capital formation by asset type. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Hungary: NAAG Chapter 3B: Gross fixed capital formation by asset type. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/naag-chapter-3b-gross-fixed-capital-formation-by-asset-type/canada/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/naag-chapter-3b-gross-fixed-capital-formation-by-asset-type/canada/hungary/">Canada vs Hungary: NAAG Chapter 3B: Gross fixed capital formation by asset type</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
NAAG Chapter 3B: Gross fixed capital formation by asset type
Unit
Percentage of GDP
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
47 places, 2,254 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

The National Accounts at a Glance (NAAG) is based on the original publication and has nine chapters: The first chapter focuses on indicators of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The second is about income and related indicators and presents measures of net national income, savings and net lending/net borrowing. The third chapter looks at the expenditure approach to GDP, with information on the key components of demand and imports. The fourth chapter presents indicators from a production perspective. The fifth chapter looks at household sector indicators such as household disposable income, saving and net worth. The sixth chapter focuses on general government, presenting indicators such as general government revenue, expenditure and gross debt. The seventh chapter looks at financial and non-financial corporations. The eighth chapter presents indicators of capital stock and depreciation. Finally, chapter 9 provides reference indicators, important in their own right but also because they are used in the construction of many of the indicators presented elsewhere in NAAG.