Malaysia vs Zimbabwe: Multi-party elections, gaps filled
Malaysia
1
in 2025
Zimbabwe
1
in 2025
Malaysia rank
1st
Zimbabwe rank
1st
Multi-party elections, gaps filled over time
- Malaysia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 1 against 1 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.
Across all 67 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 1st of 172 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher multi-party elections, gaps filled, Malaysia or Zimbabwe?
- Malaysia, at 1 against 1 in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in multi-party elections, gaps filled between Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
- 0, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
- 67 years are reported by both, from 1955 to 2025.
- How do Malaysia and Zimbabwe rank globally for multi-party elections, gaps filled?
- Malaysia ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 1st of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Multi-party elections, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Multi-party elections with 279 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.