Malaysia vs South Sudan: Multi-party elections, gaps filled
Malaysia
1
in 2025
South Sudan
1
in 2010
Malaysia rank
1st
South Sudan rank
1st
Multi-party elections, gaps filled over time
- Malaysia
- South Sudan
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 1 against 1 in South Sudan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1955 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 1st and South Sudan ranks 1st of 172 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 1 | 0.25 | 0.75 | Malaysia |
| 1960s | 1 | 0.9333 | 0.0667 | Malaysia |
| 1970s | 1 | 0.3333 | 0.6667 | Malaysia |
| 1980s | 1 | 0.75 | 0.25 | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher multi-party elections, gaps filled, Malaysia or South Sudan?
- Malaysia, at 1 against 1 in South Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in multi-party elections, gaps filled between Malaysia and South Sudan?
- 0, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and South Sudan?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1955 to 2010.
- How do Malaysia and South Sudan rank globally for multi-party elections, gaps filled?
- Malaysia ranks 1st and South Sudan ranks 1st of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Multi-party elections, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Multi-party elections with 279 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.