Chile vs Jordan: Multi-party elections, gaps filled
Chile
1
in 2025
Jordan
1
in 2025
Chile rank
1st
Jordan rank
1st
Multi-party elections, gaps filled over time
- Chile
- Jordan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 1 against 1 in Jordan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1947 it was Jordan ahead.
Chile ranks 1st and Jordan ranks 1st of 172 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 0.1 | 0.9 | Chile |
| 1970s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Chile |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher multi-party elections, gaps filled, Chile or Jordan?
- Chile, at 1 against 1 in Jordan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in multi-party elections, gaps filled between Chile and Jordan?
- 0, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Jordan?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1947 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Jordan rank globally for multi-party elections, gaps filled?
- Chile ranks 1st and Jordan ranks 1st of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Multi-party elections, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Multi-party elections with 279 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.