Brazil vs Equatorial Guinea: Multi-party elections, gaps filled
Brazil
1
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea
1
in 2025
Brazil rank
1st
Equatorial Guinea rank
1st
Multi-party elections, gaps filled over time
- Brazil
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 1 against 1 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Brazil ranks 1st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st of 172 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 5 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1980s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Brazil |
| 1990s | 1 | 0.7 | 0.3 | Brazil |
| 2000s | 1 | 0.9 | 0.1 | Brazil |
| 2010s | 1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | Brazil |
| 2020s | 1 | 0.6667 | 0.3333 | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher multi-party elections, gaps filled, Brazil or Equatorial Guinea?
- Brazil, at 1 against 1 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in multi-party elections, gaps filled between Brazil and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Equatorial Guinea?
- 48 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for multi-party elections, gaps filled?
- Brazil ranks 1st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Multi-party elections, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Multi-party elections with 279 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.