Belarus vs Eswatini: Multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled
Belarus
0
in 2025
Eswatini
0
in 2025
Belarus rank
163rd
Eswatini rank
163rd
Multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled over time
- Belarus
- Eswatini
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0 against 0 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Eswatini ahead.
Belarus ranks 163rd and Eswatini ranks 163rd of 172 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 5 and Eswatini in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Eswatini |
| 1970s | 0 | 0.6667 | 0.6667 | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | Belarus |
| 1990s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Belarus |
| 2000s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Belarus |
| 2010s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Belarus |
| 2020s | 0.6667 | 0 | 0.6667 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled, Belarus or Eswatini?
- Belarus, at 0 against 0 in Eswatini as of 2025.
- What is the difference in multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled between Belarus and Eswatini?
- 0, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Eswatini?
- 58 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Eswatini rank globally for multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled?
- Belarus ranks 163rd and Eswatini ranks 163rd of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Multi-party elections for legislature with 240 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.